Cowboy medicine or good clinical judgment? Testing minimalism.

نویسنده

  • Joseph H Friedman
چکیده

MEDICINE & HEALTH/RHODE ISLAND know if I learned anything other than when I make a clinical decision to NOT test, I should be pretty sure of what I’m doing. But I think I knew that before. My next case was a true teaching case. An 80-year old man who had suffered with Parkinson’s disease for over 30 years, now almost completely mute and wheelchair bound, but with only mild cognitive impairment, suddenly became short of breath, with a look of terror. He could not explain what was happening. I thought he may have had a pulmonary embolus. His son reported that his father had been better than baseline for the past few days, had no symptoms to suggest an illness and was quite well until he had been in the office for five minutes seeing the nurse practitioner. His heart and lung exams were normal (as best a neurologist with a cheap stethoscope can judge) and his legs showed no signs of thrombophlebitis. The tachypnea persisted for about 5 minutes and I wondered aloud about sending him to the emergency room, which his son did not want. He calmed down for a minute and then started up again. I was as stumped as I was worried that he was about to die. I could not relate this to his PD, although I suspected it was, and I asked the son to stay with his father and I parked them in an exam room next to the one I was using while I examined another patient. When I checked on him a few minutes later he was back to his baseline, breathing easily, comfortable, with his usual severe parkinsonism. His son explained that his father’s underpants had become too tight and that when he could move himself sufficiently to relieve the discomfort he was back to “normal.” I don’t know how many hours and thousands of dollars we saved, and the decision was certainly made easier by the patient and son’s advance-directives, which excluded emergency room visits, but I wonder how much my 30 years of experience with PD determined the decision to watch Cowboy Medicine or Good Clinical Judgment? Testing Minimalism Commentaries

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Clinical uncertainty, diagnostic accuracy, and outcomes in emergency department patients presenting with dyspnea.

BACKGROUND Dyspnea is a common complaint in the emergency department (ED) and may be a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that diagnostic uncertainty in this setting is associated with adverse outcomes, and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing would improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic uncertainty. METHODS A total of 592 dyspneic patients were eval...

متن کامل

To Test or to Treat? An Analysis of Influenza Testing and Antiviral Treatment Strategies Using Economic Computer Modeling

BACKGROUND Due to the unpredictable burden of pandemic influenza, the best strategy to manage testing, such as rapid or polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and antiviral medications for patients who present with influenza-like illness (ILI) is unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We developed a set of computer simulation models to evaluate the potential economic value of seven strategies unde...

متن کامل

Shared assumptions: semantic minimalism and Relevance Theory

Cappelen & Lepore (2006a) claim that linguistic communication requires shared content and criticise Relevance Theory on the grounds that it makes content sharing impossible. I argue that this criticism rests upon two important errors. The first is a flawed understanding of Relevance Theory, which causes Cappelen & Lepore to apply the perspective of an objective, omniscient third party to parts ...

متن کامل

Bayesian principles or Gestalt perception for clinical judgment.

I agree with the distinction between Bayesian and Gestalt patterns in clinical judgment described by Gianfranco Cervellin et al. [1]. This corresponds to the dual-process theory of thinking [2]. According to cognitive psychological studies, there are two fundamental approaches to decision-making: intuitive and analytical [3, 4]. The intuitive approach, also termed System 1, is unconscious, ‘‘fa...

متن کامل

Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Risk scores, biomarkers and clinical judgment.

Undifferentiated chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency department attendance and admission to hospitals. Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is an important cause of chest pain, and accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in the emergency department must be a clinical priority. In the future, the incidence of NSTE-ACS will rise further as higher sensitivi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Medicine and health, Rhode Island

دوره 93 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010